Public Administration from a Local Wisdom Perspective

Ni Ketut Arniti, Isnaeni Yuliani, Bambang Irawan, Hidayat Hidayat, Athiya Zahidah

Abstract


Abstract

A good government system requires a public administration system. In this era of fast globalization, the western administration system often causes local wisdom values to be forgotten. This study then aims to see how public administration is seen through the perspective of local wisdom. This research will then be carried out using a qualitative approach. The data used in this research is secondary data from research results or previous studies. The results of this study found that there is no one public administration system that is universal and can be implemented anywhere. Generally, each region has a public administration system based on local wisdom. In Indonesia, the practice of an administrative system based on local wisdom can be seen in the kingdom era, where charismatic legitimacy and traditional legitimacy became the representation of Indigenous Public Administration.

Keywords: Public Administration, Local Wisdom, Western Public Administrations.

 

Abstrak

Sistem pemerintahan yang baik membutuhkan sistem administrasi publik. Di era globalisasi yang cepat ini, sistem pemerintahan barat sering kali menyebabkan nilai-nilai kearifan lokal dilupakan. Kajian ini kemudian bertujuan untuk melihat bagaimana administrasi publik dilihat melalui perspektif kearifan lokal. Penelitian ini selanjutnya akan dilakukan dengan menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif. Data yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah data sekunder dari hasil penelitian atau penelitian sebelumnya. Hasil penelitian ini menemukan bahwa tidak ada satupun sistem administrasi publik yang bersifat universal dan dapat diterapkan dimana saja. Umumnya, setiap daerah memiliki sistem administrasi publik yang didasarkan pada kearifan lokal. Di Indonesia, praktik sistem pemerintahan berbasis kearifan lokal dapat dilihat pada masa kerajaan, di mana legitimasi kharismatik dan legitimasi tradisional menjadi representasi Administrasi Publik Adat.

Kata kunci: Administrasi Publik, Kearifan Lokal, Administrasi Publik Barat.


Keywords


Public Administration, Local Wisdom, Western Public Administrations.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Agiamoh, R. G. (2020). From bureaucracy to market? Ongoing reform and performance challenges of solid waste administration in Moscow. Public administration issues, 5, 149-170.

Althaus, C. (2020). Different paradigms of evidence and knowledge: Recognising, honouring, and celebrating Indigenous ways of knowing and being. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 79(2), 187-207.

Boin, A., Brock, K., Craft, J., Halligan, J., ‘t Hart, P., Roy, J., ... & Turnbull, L. (2020). Beyond COVID‐19: Five commentaries on expert knowledge, executive action, and accountability in governance and public administration. Canadian Public Administration, 63(3), 339-368.

Bojang, M. B. (2021). Public Value Management: An Emerging Paradigm in Public Administration. International Journal of Business, Management and Economics, 2(4), 225-238.

Bouckaert, G., Galli, D., Kuhlmann, S., Reiter, R., & Van Hecke, S. (2020). European Coronationalism? A Hot Spot Governing a Pandemic Crisis. Public Administration Review.

Chafik, S., & Drechsler, W. (2022). In the semi‐shadow of the global west: Moroccan zawāyā as good public administration. Public Administration Review, 82(4), 747-755.

Chen, J., Yang, Y., & Yu, J. (2022). Task complexity, organizational size, and performance: an examination of the US state budget agencies. Public Management Review, 1-26.

Donaldson, J. P., & Allen-Handy, A. (2020). The nature and power of conceptualizations of learning. Educational Psychology Review, 32(2), 545-570.

Fatmawati, E. (2021). Strategies to grow a proud attitude towards Indonesian cultural diversity. Linguistics and Culture Review, 5(S1), 810-820.

Hasan, I. R., Andi Agustang, A. A., Kahar, F., & Tahir, H. (2019). “Super Service Delivery”: an advanced conceptual model of one-stop service for wide administrative region. Problems and perspectives in management, 17(1), 189-201.

House-Niamke, S., & Eckerd, A. (2021). Institutional injustice: How public administration has fostered and can ameliorate racial disparities. Administration & Society, 53(2), 305-324.

Knafo, S. (2020). Neoliberalism and the origins of public management. Review of International Political Economy, 27(4), 780-801.

Kutor, S. K., Raileanu, A., & Simandan, D. (2021). International migration, cross-cultural interaction, and the development of personal wisdom. Migration Studies, 9(3), 490-513.

Li, T., & Wang, Z. M. (2021). The top-heavy shape of authoritarian bureaucracy: evidence from Russia and China. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 00208523211058865.

Lin, F. T., Wu, H. C., & Tang, C. C. (2021). A concise history of sociology’s ‘indigenization’in postwar Taiwan: Emergence, transformation, and invisibilization. International Sociology, 36(5), 662-673.

Lorenzo, M. P. (2022). ASEAN regionalism and cross-border research of Philippine higher education: the case of the University of the Philippines Diliman campus. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 20(5), 590-607.

Malandrino, A., & Demichelis, E. (2020). Conflict in decision making and variation in public administration outcomes in Italy during the COVID‐19 crisis. European Policy Analysis, 6(2), 138-146.

Mitchell, C. E. (2022). Machiavelli and the Political Use of The Christian Doctrine of Free Will. History of Political Thought, 43(3), 436-459.

Moloney, K., & Moloney, S. (2020). Australian Quarantine Policy: From centralization to coordination with mid‐Pandemic COVID‐19 shifts. Public Administration Review, 80(4), 671-682.

Nirwansyah, A. W., Demirdag, I., Sarjanti, E., & Bramasta, D. (2022). The Existence of Indigenous Knowledge and Local Landslide Mitigation: A Case Study of Banyumas People in Gununglurah Village, Central Java, Indonesia. Sustainability, 14(19), 12765.

Nur, M. I., Aeni, R. Q., & Juana, T. (2021). Measuring the Essence of Local Wisdom’s value in the Behavior of Government Apparatuses in State Administration Institutions. Jurnal Administrasi Publik: Public Administration Journal, 11(2), 161-168.

Postell, J. (2021). The ambiguity of expertise in the administrative state. Social Philosophy and Policy, 38(1), 85-108.

Roberts, A. (2020). Bridging levels of public administration: How macro shapes meso and micro. Administration & Society, 52(4), 631-656.

Suripto, S., Keban, T. Y., & Pamungkas, S. H. A. (2021). Indigeneous Public Administration: A Review and Deconstruction of the Idea, Concept, and Theory of Government and Governance. Jurnal Borneo Administrator, 17(3), 305-318.

Woolhandler, S., Himmelstein, D. U., Ahmed, S., Bailey, Z., Bassett, M. T., Bird, M., ... & Venkataramani, A. (2021). Public policy and health in the Trump era. The Lancet, 397(10275), 705-753.

Yang, K. (2020). Unprecedented challenges, familiar paradoxes: COVID‐19 and governance in a new normal state of risks. Public Administration Review, 80(4), 657-664.

Zang, Y., Liu, Y., Yang, Y., Woods, M., & Fois, F. (2020). Rural decline or restructuring? Implications for sustainability transitions in rural China. Land Use Policy, 94, 104531.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.37950/ijd.v4i4.382

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


 

 

View my State

 

International Journal of Demos (IJD) is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.