Model Structure Of Public Policy Based On Social Learning Onto Intolerant In Pandeglang District, Banten, Indonesia

Kandung Sapto Nugroho, Rahayu Rahayu, Muhammad Adnan, Hardi Warsono

Abstract


This research aims to design a model of public policy drafting in governance that can ensure the continuity of democratic principles. The principle of justice and equality both economically, socially, and politically are these foundations of democracy. If this principle is applied in the running of the government management process will be able to guarantee every individual citizen so that good governance is achieved. This approach of research with Positivistic with survey method through a closed questionnaire that has been done test validity, normality, reliability of the questionnaire to the leader of regional device organization in Pandeglang District government environment. This research will contribute to the mechanism of public policy retrieval with the primary mission to minimize potential conflicts. Please note that in 2011 in Pandeglang District, there had been a religious conflict in the case of Cikeusik Ahmadiyah, and by Tirto.id, Banten declared as the Intolerant region. The results of this study show that government bureaucracy in providing public services such as education, health, and religion has paid attention to the aspects of equalization and social justice, but it requires acceleration for bureaucracy related to the challenges of growing public problems. The influx of the 4.0 Industrial Revolution is aligned with the disruption era, the bureaucracy has to make adjustments to provide public service with typical generations of baby boomers, generation X, millennial generation even now already on Z generation and Alpha generation are already native to the Internet.

 

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk merancang model penyusunan kebijakan publik dalam tata pemerintahan yang dapat menjamin kelangsungan prinsip demokrasi. Prinsip keadilan dan kesetaraan baik secara ekonomi, sosial, dan politik adalah fondasi demokrasi tersebut. Apabila prinsip ini diterapkan dalam menjalankan proses pengelolaan pemerintahan akan dapat menjamin setiap individu warga negara sehingga tercapai tata pemerintahan yang baik. Pendekatan penelitian ini bersifat positivistik dengan metode survei melalui angket tertutup yang telah dilakukan uji validitas, normalitas, reliabilitas angket kepada pimpinan perangkat perangkat daerah di lingkungan Pemerintah Kabupaten Pandeglang. Penelitian ini akan berkontribusi pada mekanisme pengambilan kebijakan publik dengan misi utama meminimalisir potensi konflik. Perlu diketahui bahwa pada tahun 2011 di Kabupaten Pandeglang pernah terjadi konflik agama dalam kasus Ahmadiyah Cikeusik, dan oleh Tirto.id, Banten dinyatakan sebagai Daerah Intoleran. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa birokrasi pemerintah dalam memberikan pelayanan publik seperti pendidikan, kesehatan, dan agama telah memperhatikan aspek pemerataan dan keadilan sosial, namun diperlukan percepatan birokrasi terkait dengan tantangan permasalahan publik yang semakin berkembang. Masuknya Revolusi Industri 4.0 ini selaras dengan era disrupsi, birokrasi harus melakukan penyesuaian untuk memberikan pelayanan publik dengan tipikal generasi baby boomer, generasi X, generasi milenial bahkan sekarang sudah ada generasi Z dan generasi Alpha sudah asli Internet.

 


Keywords


public policy, social equity, intolerant

Full Text:

PDF (108-124)

References


Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2018). Collaborative platforms as a governance strategy. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mux030

Asamoah, J. K. (2017). The Role of Leadership in Combating Corruption in Decentralized Governance Structures of Ghana: An Empirical Study of GA South District Assembly. Review of Public Administration and Management. https://doi.org/10.4172/2315-7844.1000228

Buss, T. F., & Ahmed, U. (2015). Social equity and development. In Justice for All: Promoting Social Equity in Public Administration. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315703060-12

Daudi Mwita Nyamaka. (2011). Social Contract Theory of John Locke (1932-1704) in the Contemporary World. St. Augustine University Law Journal, 1(1).

DeLeon, P. H. (1996). Proceedings of the American Psychological Association, Incorporated, for the year 1995: Minutes of the annual meeting of the Council of Representatives: August 10 and 13, 1995, New York, NY, and February 16–18, 1996, Washington, DC. American Psychologist. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066x.51.8.805

Dye, T. R. (2013). Understanding Public Policy, Fourteenth Edition. United State: Pearson Education.

Elfiandri, Perdamaian, F. R. (2015). Peraturan Bersama Menteri Agama dan Menteri Dalam Negeri. Jurnal RISALAH,.

Emerson, K., Nabatchi, T., & Balogh, S. (2012). An integrative framework for collaborative governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mur011

Engeli, I., & Allison, C. R. (2014). Conceptual and Methodological Challenges in Comparative Public Policy. In Comparative Policy Studies. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137314154.0004

Esquith, S. L. (1997). John Rawls and the recent history of public administration. Journal of Management History (Archive). https://doi.org/10.1108/13552529710191162

Francis Mukosa1, B. M. & M. K. (2017). What is Public Policy? How is it relatedto the law? Imperial Journal of Interdisciplinary Research, 3(9), 1. Retrieved from http://www.onlinejournal.in

Frederickson, H. G. (1990). Public Administration and Social Equity. Public Administration Review. https://doi.org/10.2307/976870

Houngbo, P. T., Coleman, H. L. S., Zweekhorst, M., De Cock Buning, T., Medenou, D., & Bunders, J. F. G. (2017). A model for good governance of Healthcare Technology Management in the public sector: Learning from evidence-informed policy development and implementation in Benin. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0168842

Howlett, M., & Cashore, B. (2014). Conceptualizing Public Policy. In Comparative Policy Studies. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137314154_2

Human potential development as a prerequisite of public policy efficiency. (2014). Studia Humanitatis.

ISLAM, N. (2007). RE-CONCEPTUALIZING PUBLIC POLICY PROCESS: REVIEW OF CONCEPTS AND MODELS. Lahore Journal of Policy Studies, 1(1), 7. Retrieved from http://www.lahorejournalofpolicystudies.org/LJPS 1-1.pdf

Jain, A. K. (2001). Corruption: A Review. Journal of Economic Surveys. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6419.00133

Kemendagri, K. D. N. R. I. (2008). Undang-Undang Nomor 40 Tahun 2008 tentang Penghapusan Diskriminasi Ras dan Etnis. Https://Kemendagri.Go.Id/Arsip/Detail/215/Undangundang-No-40-Tahun-2008.

LaShawn D. Moore and John C. Morris. (2009). An Examination of Social Equity and its Dimensional Emphasis in the Public Administration Literature. Journal of Public Management & Social Policy, 15(113). Retrieved from https://28b3dd4c-a-e2cc6547-s-sites.googlegroups.com/a/jpmsp.com/new-jpmsp/15-1-Moore.pdf?attachauth=ANoY7co-nyI993drOlITHgzRJccG0kgp6R99Q1jBSCtnFVoFhf0F5LMpLX_njKBzT9ewVhqpLL5mmnHx9gwJlnPdElq3YXRGIu6254ZoGMF0Izkath2cHF3ftV_TOCMjluy9QfBS_A8X8on1WmEooN0i6h

Lasswell, H. D. (1970). The emerging conception of the policy sciences. Policy Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00145189

MAGUIRE, J. (2002). SPORT WORLDS : A SOCIOLOGICAL PERSPECTIVE.

Majelis, K., Rakyat, P., & Indonesia, R. (1999). Undang-Undang Nomor 39 Tahun 1999 Tentang Hak Asasi Manusia. Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 39 Thn 1999 Tentang Hak Asasi Manusia.

Morris, M. (2009). Social justice and communication: Mill, Marx, and Habermas. Social Justice Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-009-0091-6

Naylor, L. A., Wilson-Gentry, L. A., & Wooldridge, B. (2016). Rethinking Connection: Master of Public Administration Student Perceptions of Transactional Presence. Journal of Public Affairs Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/15236803.2016.12002227

PAL, L. A. (2007). Challenging the Performance Movement: Accountability, Complexity and Democratic Values ? By Beryl Radin. Governance. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0491.2007.00370_4.x

PASHA, “Musthafa Kamal.” (2000). Pancasila dalam tinjauan Historis Yuridis dan Filosofis. Yogyakarta: Yogyakarta Citra Karsa Ma. Retrieved from http://kin.perpusnas.go.id/DisplayData.aspx?pId=44688&pRegionCode=UNIAD&pClientId=125

Politisasi Birokrasi Pemerintahan Desa Pada Era Reformasi. (2015). JKAP (Jurnal Kebijakan Dan Administrasi Publik). https://doi.org/10.22146/jkap.8335

Praswati, A. N. (2017). Perkembangan Model Helix Dalam Peningkatan Inovasi. Seminar Nasional Riset Manajemen & Bisinis : Perkembangan Konsep Dan Riset E-Business Di Indonesia.

Presiden Republik Indonesia. (2009). Undang-Undang RI No. 25 Tahun 2009 tentang Pelayanan Publik. Lembaran Negara RI Tahun 2009. Sekretariat Negara. Jakarta. https://doi.org/http://pelayanan.jakarta.go.id/download/regulasi/undang-undang-nomor-25-tahun-2009-tentang-pelayanan-publik.pdf

Prihatini, J., Ma’ruf, M., & Handayani, N. (2019). THE EMPOWERMENT IN ACCELERATION AND DEFENCE OF POVERTY IN DISTRICT OF INDRAMAYU, WEST JAVA, INDONESIA. https://doi.org/10.32528/pi.v0i0.2476

Radzik-Maruszak, K., & Bátorová, M. (2015). Citizen Participation and Engagement in Urban Governance: Perception of Finnish and Polish Local Officials. NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy. https://doi.org/10.1515/nispa-2015-0005

S, Z. (2017). Street Level Bureaucrats as the Ultimate Policy Makers. Journal of Political Sciences & Public Affairs. https://doi.org/10.4172/2332-0761.1000306

Suparman, H. (2013). Penegakan Hukum terhadap Penyelenggaraan Pelayanan Publik. Jurnal Wawasan Yuridika.

Uhaib, M., & Djani, W. (2018). Indonesia Public Administration Reform in Supporting Good Governance. Review of Public Administration and Management. https://doi.org/10.4172/2315-7844.1000256

Vigoda-Gadot, E., & Drory, A. (2006). Handbook of Organizational Politics. Handbook of Organizational Politics. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781847201874

Vigoda, E. (2002). From responsiveness to collaboration: Governance, citizens, and the next generation of public administration. Public Administration Review. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6210.00235

Wang, J., & McFadden, E. S. (2016). The Absence of Social Equity Measurement in Municipal Service Privatization. State and Local Government Review. https://doi.org/10.1177/0160323x15624474

WILENSKI, P. (1986). ADMINISTRATIVE REFORM – GENERAL PRINCIPLES AND THE AUSTRALIAN EXPERIENCE. Public Administration. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.1986.tb00621.x

World Bank. (2006). Equity and Development. Equity and Development. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-0-8213-6105-4

Yasir, A. (2015). Perumusan Kebijakan dan Peraturan Daerah Dengan Mekanisme Konsultasi Publik. FIAT JUSTISIA. https://doi.org/10.25041/fiatjustisia.v6no2.327

Yunus, F. M. (2014). Konflik Agama Di Indonesia Problem Dan Solusi Pemecahannya. Substantia.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.37950/ijd.v2i2.53

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


 

 

View my State

 

International Journal of Demos (IJD) is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.