Perbandingan Implementasi Smart City di Indonesia: Studi Kasus: Perbandingan Smart People di Kota Surabaya dan Kota Malang
Abstract
This study focuses on the problem of smart people as an indicator of the success of smart cities in Surabaya and Malang. Smart people are one of the supporting dimensions of the creation of a smart city or what is called a Smart City (Zubizarreta, Seravalli, And, & Arrizabalaga, 2016). So that the factors that make a city smart, one of which is measured by the quality of its human resources; which includes the human development index which is measured by how the level of unemployment, poverty level, health problems, and also seen from the aspect of public knowledge in receiving information, disseminating information, related to the development of creativity carried out and also the inclusiveness of empowering activities carried out by several people. (Iyer, 2018). In addition, the activities that are encountered in the city of Surabaya in community activities, already have quite innovative and creative networks. Meanwhile, Malang City is still heading for the stage of good quality. There needs to be motivation and encouragement so that Malang City is able to follow in the footsteps of the development of smart people in the city of Surabaya.
Penelitian ini berfokus pada masalah smart people sebagai indicator keberhasilan smart city di Kota Surabaya dan Kota Malang. Smart people merupakan salah satu dimensi pendukung dari terwujudnya kota pintar atau yang disebut dengan Smart City (Zubizarreta, Seravalli, And, & Arrizabalaga, 2016). Sehingga faktor-faktor yang menjadikan sebuah kota dapat dikatakan pintar salah satunya diukur dari kualitas sumber daya manusianya; yang meliputi dari indeks pembangunan manusianya yang diukur dari bagaimana tingkat pengamgguran, tingkat kemiskinan, masalah kesehatan, dan juga dilihat dari aspek pengetahuan masyarakat di dalam menerima informasi, menyebarkan informasi, terkait dengan penumbuhan kratifitas yang dilakukan dan juga inklusivitas pemberdayaan kegiatan yang dilakukan oleh beberapa orang (Iyer, 2018). Selain itu, aktifitas yang ditemui di Kota Surabaya dalam kegiatan komunitasnya, sudah memiliki jaringan yang cukup inovatif dan juga kreatif. Sedangkan untuk di Kota Malang masih menuju tahapan kualitas yang baik. Perlu adanya motivasi dan dorongan supaya Kota Malang mampu mengikuti jejak perkembangan smart people yang ada di Kota Surabaya.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDF (163-173)References
Alkaf, And, & Sutrisno. (2019). Smart surveillance. Jurnal Sosioteknologi, 2(April), 92–102. https://doi.org/10.5614/sostek.itbj.2019.18.1.7
Akhmad,F. ,& Nuzir. (2015). Smart People, Smart Mobility, (September), 2–6. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.3056.4324
Arnandy, D. A., & Erma Suryani, S. T. (2018). Dynamic System Model Development for Strategic Planning Information Technology in the Framework of Developing Smart People and Smart Economy (Case Study in Surabaya).
Aeni. (2017). Kontribusi Kampung Warna Jodipan Kota Malang Dalam Meningkatkan Pemberdayaan Ekonomi dan Pendidikan Sosial Masyarakat Menuju Smart City. (pp. 35–89).
Affandi, Setijadi, Kusrahardjo, And, & Suprajitno. (2016). Inovasi SIEC-ITS dalam Implementasi Teknologi Informasi dan [Tele]Komunikasi Mendukung Framework Smart-city yang Berkelanjutan. In Conference on Innovation and Industrial Applications (CINIA 2016) (pp. 1–8). China.
April Insani, P. (2017). Mewujudkan Kota Responsif Melalui Smart City. PUBLISIA (Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Publik), 2(Smart City), 25–31.
Bappenas. (2015). Pengembangan Kota Cerdas di Indonesia. In Kementrian PPN (Ed.), Pengembangan Kota Cerdas di Indonesia (pp. 5–45). Bandung: Bappenas.
Budiman, Darmawan, And, & Kurniawati. (2013). Analisis dan Perancangan Sistem Social e-Learning untuk Mendukung Program Bandung Smart City. Jurnal Tugas Akhir, 2(1), 998.
Carolina, N., & Alcantara, G. L. L. (2014). Development of a Smart City and its Adoption and Acceptance: the Case of New Songdo (*). Digiworld Economic Journal, 4(96), 113–128.
Enceng, And, & Hidayat. (2016). Peningkatan Layanan Publik Melalui Smart Governance Dan Smart Mobility. Jurnal Administrasi Pembangunan, 4(2), 87–156.
Felasari, S., & Roychansyah, M. S. (2019, October). Importance performance analysis for smart city implementation in Surabaya, Indonesia. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science (Vol. 340, No. 1, p. 012039). IOP Publishing.
Hasanah. (2015). Green City , Smart City , Compact City , Mega City. In Researchgate (pp. 3–19).
Iyer. (2018). Smart Cities, Connected Communities Data-Driven Decision Making in West Baltimore for Smart Technology Planning. Frances: Jacob France Institute.
Kshetri, N., Alcantara, L. L., & Park, Y. (2014). Development of a smart city and its adoption and acceptance: the case of new songdo. Communications & Strategies, (96), 113.
Monzon. (2015). Smart Cities Concept and Challenges. Nternational Conference on Smart Cities and Green ICT Systems (SMARTGREENS), Vol. 1 No.(Januari), 1–11.
Nuswantara, Bhawika, And, & Qomariyah. (2018). Kampung Literasi ITS sebagai Model Pengembangan Literasi di TBM. Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat – LPPM ITS, 2(2), 76–84.
Nuzir. (2015). Smart People , Smart Mobility. In Researchgate (September, pp. 5–15). -. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.3056.4324
Paramasatya, And, & Rahmawati. (2017). Penentuan Variabel Berpengaruh Terhadap Pengembangan Kampung Cerdas dalam. Jurnal Teknik, 6(2), 434–437.
Pelayanan Publik Berbasis Konsep Smart City . Jurnal Administrasi Publik, 39–43.
Prasetiyo Wibowo, S. T. (2013). Strategi Pendidikan Karakter Peduli Lingkungan Melalui Program Kampung Hijau Di Kampung Margorukun Surabaya 303–315.
Purnomowati, And, & Ismini. (2014). Konsep Smart City dan Pengembangan Pariwisata. Jurnal JIBEKA, Vol. 8 No.(Februari), 65–71.
Purnomo, Anand, And, & Choi. (2017). The complexity and consequences of the policy implementation dealing with sustainable ideas. Journal of Sustainable Forestry, 00(00), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/10549811.2017.1406373
Putro. (2019). Road Map Smart City di Kota Malang. Jurnal Pangripta, Vol. 1. No1.(Maret), 307–319.
Rahmat, A., Syadiah, N., & Subur, B. (2016). Smart coastal city: sea pollution awareness for people in surabaya waterfront city. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 227, 770-777.
Rahmawati, Sulistyarso, Ariastita, Yusuf, And, & Paramasatya. (2018). Smart kampung for Surabaya smart city : Criteria redefined Smart kampung for Surabaya smart city : Criteria redefined. In Rahmawati (Ed.), IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science (pp. 1–7). Surabaya, Indonesia: Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember.
Silas, J., & Ernawati, R. (2013). Liveability of Settlements by People in the Kampung of Surabaya. In Proceedings of the 19th International CIB World Building Congress: Construction and Society, QUT, Brisbane (pp. 1-7).
Silas, And, & Ernawati. (2011). Liveability of Settlements by People in the Kampung of Surabaya. Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan Dan Kebijakan Publik, 4–8.
Subekti Tia. (2017). Menguji Sistem E-Government Kota Malang Menuju Smart City. In Researchgate (pp. 18–30).
Sucitawathi, Joniarta, And, & Dewi. (2018). Konsep “ Smart City ” Dan Tata Kelola Pemerintahan Di Kota Denpasar. Jurnal Administrasi Publik, 3(1), 9–15.
Sulhan, And, & Sasongko. (2017). Implementasi Kebijakan Program Penanggulangan Indonesia Pintar ( Studi Kasus di Kelurahan Kauman Kota Malang ). Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Ilmu Politik, 6(1), 15–18.
Wanto. (2014). Strategi Pemerintah Kota Malang Dalam Meningkatkan Kualitas
Widodo. (2016). Pengembangan e-Government di Pemerintahan Daerah Dalam Rangka Mewujudkan Smart city (studi di Pemerintah Daerah Kota Malang). Jurnal Ilmiah Administrasi Publik, 2(4), 227–235.
Zubizarreta, Seravalli, And, & Arrizabalaga. (2016). Smart City Concept : What It Is and What It Should Be. Journal Urban Planning Developement, 142(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)UP
DOI: https://doi.org/10.37950/ijd.v2i2.61
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
International Journal of Demos (IJD) is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
