Optimalisasi Pengawasan Partisipatif Pemilih Melalui Inovasi Teknologi Pendidikan Politik Dengan Model Digital Civic Pedagogy

Siti Aspariah; Agus Aan Hermawan

doi:10.37950/joc.v4i1.659

Authors

Siti Aspariah Universitas Bina Bangsa
Agus Aan Hermawan Universitas Serang Raya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37950/joc.v4i1.659

Abstract

Pilkada 2024 menuntut optimalisasi peran pemilih tidak hanya sebagai peserta elektoral, tetapi juga sebagai aktor aktif dalam pengawasan proses demokrasi di tingkat lokal. Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis optimalisasi pengawasan partisipatif pemilih melalui inovasi teknologi pendidikan politik dengan menggunakan model Digital Civic Pedagogy. Model ini memposisikan teknologi digital sebagai medium pedagogis untuk membangun literasi politik, kesadaran kewargaan, dan kapasitas partisipatif pemilih dalam pengawasan pemilihan kepala daerah. Penelitian menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif dengan desain studi kasus terhadap inovasi pengawasan yang dikembangkan oleh Bawaslu Kota Serang pada Pilkada 2024, meliputi pemanfaatan teknologi informasi, edukasi dan sosialisasi interaktif, pelibatan masyarakat dalam pengawasan partisipatif, serta pengembangan platform keterbukaan data Pilkada. Data dikumpulkan melalui wawancara mendalam, studi dokumentasi, dan observasi terhadap praktik pengawasan partisipatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa inovasi teknologi pendidikan politik berbasis model Digital Civic Pedagogy mampu mengoptimalkan pemahaman pemilih terhadap tahapan Pilkada dan mekanisme pengawasan, serta meningkatkan keterlibatan aktif pemilih dalam pemantauan dan pelaporan dugaan pelanggaran. Penelitian ini menegaskan pentingnya integrasi pendidikan kewargaan digital dan pengawasan partisipatif sebagai strategi penguatan demokrasi lokal yang berkelanjutan.

References

Antlöv, H., Brinkerhoff, D. W., & Rapp, E. (2016). Civil society–government relations in Indonesia: Beyond co-optation and resistance. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 27(3), 1151–1173. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-015-9576-5

Aspinall, E., & Mietzner, M. (2019). Indonesia’s democratic paradox: Competitive elections amidst rising illiberalism. Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, 55(3), 295–317. https://doi.org/10.1080/00074918.2019.1690412

Bawaslu RI. (2020). Indeks kerawanan pemilu: Metodologi dan hasil pemetaan. Badan Pengawas Pemilihan Umum Republik Indonesia.

Bennett, W. L. (2012). The personalization of politics: Political identity, social media, and changing patterns of participation. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 644(1), 20–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716212451428

Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. SAGE Publications.

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Dahl, R. A. (2015). On democracy (2nd ed.). Yale University Press.

Dalton, R. J. (2017). The participation gap: Social status and political inequality. Oxford University Press.

Denzin, N. K. (2012). Triangulation 2.0. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 6(2), 80–88. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689812437186

Fung, A. (2015). Putting the public back into governance: The challenges of citizen participation and its future. Public Administration Review, 75(4), 513–522. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12361

Isin, E. F., & Nielsen, G. M. (2008). Acts of citizenship. Zed Books.

Jenkins, H., Ito, M., & boyd, d. (2016). Participatory culture in a networked era: A conversation on youth, learning, commerce, and politics. Polity Press.

Kahne, J., & Bowyer, B. (2019). Can media literacy education increase digital engagement in politics? Learning, Media and Technology, 44(2), 211–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2019.1601108

Kvale, S., & Brinkmann, S. (2015). InterViews: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Lim, M. (2017). Freedom to hate: Social media, algorithmic enclaves, and the rise of tribal nationalism in Indonesia. Critical Asian Studies, 49(3), 411–427. https://doi.org/10.1080/14672715.2017.1341188

Meijer, A., Curtin, D., & Hillebrandt, M. (2018). Open government: Connecting vision and voice. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 78(1), 10–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852314564784

Mirra, N., Morrell, E., Cain, E., Scorza, D., & Ford, A. (2018). Educating for a critical democracy: Civic participation reimagined in the digital age. Teachers College Press.

Norris, P. (2014). Why electoral integrity matters. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107280861

Norris, P., & Nai, A. (2017). Election watchdogs: Transparency, accountability and integrity. Oxford University Press.

Palinkas, L. A., Horwitz, S. M., Green, C. A., Wisdom, J. P., Duan, N., & Hoagwood, K. (2015). Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 42(5), 533–544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y

Print, M., & Lange, D. (2013). Civic education and competences for engaging citizens in democracies. Sense Publishers.

Theocharis, Y., & van Deth, J. W. (2018). Political participation in a changing world: Conceptual and empirical challenges. Routledge.

Wardle, C., & Derakhshan, H. (2017). Information disorder: Toward an interdisciplinary framework for research and policymaking. Council of Europe.

Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Optimalisasi Pengawasan Partisipatif Pemilih Melalui Inovasi Teknologi Pendidikan Politik Dengan Model Digital Civic Pedagogy

Authors

DOI:

Abstract

References

Downloads

Published

Issue

Section

License