Manajemen Inovasi Digital dan Etika Organisasi dalam Penguatan Transparansi dan Akuntabilitas Pemerintahan Indonesia

Widaningsih; Susi Adiawaty

doi:10.37950/joc.v5i1.682

Authors

Widaningsih Universitas Garut
Susi Adiawaty Institute Bisnis Nusantara

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37950/joc.v5i1.682

Abstract

Artikel ini menganalisis peran manajemen inovasi digital dan etika organisasi dalam penguatan transparansi serta akuntabilitas pada institusi pemerintahan di Indonesia. Artikel ini berangkat dari argumen bahwa transformasi digital di sektor publik tidak cukup dipahami sebagai modernisasi teknologi, melainkan sebagai proses manajemen organisasi yang mencakup kepemimpinan, kapasitas kelembagaan, koordinasi, sistem pengendalian, serta orientasi pada nilai publik. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif dengan desain narrative literature review terhadap artikel jurnal, buku, regulasi, dokumen resmi pemerintah, dan laporan lembaga internasional yang relevan dengan pemerintahan digital, manajemen sektor publik, integritas organisasi, dan akuntabilitas. Hasil kajian menunjukkan bahwa SPBE, e-procurement, open data, sistem pengaduan daring, dan audit berbasis data dapat meningkatkan efektivitas manajerial melalui penguatan keterlacakan proses, perluasan akses informasi, dan penguatan kontrol kelembagaan. Namun demikian, efektivitas instrumen tersebut sangat dipengaruhi oleh kapasitas organisasi, komitmen manajerial, kualitas tata kelola data, interoperabilitas sistem, mekanisme pengendalian internal, dan pemerataan inklusi digital. Artikel ini menegaskan bahwa keberhasilan transformasi digital pemerintahan di Indonesia memerlukan integrasi antara manajemen inovasi digital, etika organisasi, dan sistem kontrol kelembagaan agar menghasilkan bukan hanya transparansi prosedural, tetapi juga akuntabilitas substantif dan peningkatan kinerja tata kelola.

Kata kunci: manajemen inovasi digital; etika organisasi; transparansi; akuntabilitas; manajemen sektor publik

References

Attard, J., Orlandi, F., Scerri, S., & Auer, S. (2015). A systematic review of open government data initiatives. Government Information Quarterly, 32(4), 399–418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2015.07.006

Bonina, C., & Eaton, B. (2020). Cultivating open government data platform ecosystems through governance: Lessons from Buenos Aires, Mexico City and Montevideo. Government Information Quarterly, 37(3). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2020.101479

Bovens, M. (2007). Analysing and assessing accountability: A conceptual framework. European Law Journal, 13(4), 447–468. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2007.00378.x

Brown, D. C. G., & Toze, S. (2017). Information governance in digitized public administration. Canadian Public Administration, 60(4), 581–604.

Cordella, A., & Tempini, N. (2015). E-government and organizational change: Reappraising the role of ICT and bureaucracy in public service delivery. Government Information Quarterly, 32(3), 279–286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2015.03.005

Dawes, S. S., Vidiasova, L., & Parkhimovich, O. (2016). Planning and designing open government data programs: An ecosystem approach. Government Information Quarterly, 33(1), 15–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2016.01.003

Development, O. for E. C. and. (2017). Recommendation of the Council on Public Integrity. OECD Publishing.

Fox, J. (2007). The uncertain relationship between transparency and accountability. Development in Practice, 17(4–5), 663–671. https://doi.org/10.1080/09614520701469955

Gascó-Hernández, M., Martin, E. G., Reggi, L., Pyo, S., & Luna-Reyes, L. F. (2018). Promoting the use of open government data: Cases of training and engagement. Government Information Quarterly, 35(2), 233–242.

Indonesia, P. Peraturan Presiden Republik Indonesia Nomor 95 Tahun 2018 tentang Sistem Pemerintahan Berbasis Elektronik. , (2018).

Indonesia, P. Peraturan Presiden Republik Indonesia Nomor 39 Tahun 2019 tentang Satu Data Indonesia. , (2019).

Kim, S., & Lee, J. (2016). Anti-corruption initiatives in South Korea: An empirical study of the KONEPS e-procurement system. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 82(4), 691–708.

Lindgren, I., & van Veenstra, A. F. (2018). Digital government transformation: A case illustrating public e-service development as part of public sector transformation. Proceedings of the 19th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research: Governance in the Data Age, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1145/3209281.3209302

Lindquist, E. A., & Huse, I. (2017). Accountability and monitoring government in the digital era: Promise, realism and research for digital-era governance. Canadian Public Administration, 60(4), 627–656.

Matheus, R., Janssen, M., & Janowski, T. (2021). Design principles for creating digital transparency in government. Government Information Quarterly, 38(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2020.101550

Menzel, D. C. (2015). Ethics management for public administrators: Leading and building organizations of integrity. Routledge.

Mergel, I., Gong, Y., & Bertot, J. (2018). Agile government: Systematic literature review and future research. Government Information Quarterly, 35(2), 291–298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2018.04.003

Mergel, I., Kleibrink, A., & Sörvik, J. (2018). Open data outcomes: U.S. cities between product and process innovation. Government Information Quarterly, 35(4), 622–632.

Mungiu-Pippidi, A. (2017). The quest for good governance: How societies develop control of corruption. Cambridge University Press.

Svara, J. H. (2015). The ethics primer for public administrators in government and nonprofit organizations (3rd ed.). Jones & Bartlett Learning.