Strategi Komunikasi Politik Partai Dalam Menghadapi Dominasi Pemilih Generasi Z dan Milenial Pada Pemilu Indonesia 2029

Authors

  • Ristu Tri Hastawan Universitas Padjadjaran

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37950/joc.v5i3.843

Abstract

Transformasi demografi pemilih dan percepatan teknologi digital diproyeksikan menjadi faktor penentu dinamika politik Indonesia menjelang Pemilu 2029. Pada Pemilu 2024, Generasi Z dan Milenial mencapai sekitar 58,38% dari total Daftar Pemilih Tetap (DPT), dan diproyeksikan meningkat menjadi sekitar 61–65% pada Pemilu 2029. Kondisi ini menuntut partai politik mengubah orientasi komunikasi dari kampanye konvensional menjadi pendekatan berbasis data, teknologi digital, dan pembangunan kepercayaan publik. Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis karakteristik pemilih Generasi Z dan Milenial, mengidentifikasi tantangan komunikasi politik menuju Pemilu 2029, serta merumuskan model strategi komunikasi politik yang adaptif bagi partai politik. Penelitian menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif dengan metode studi kepustakaan (library research), memanfaatkan data resmi KPU, BPS, dan APJII serta literatur ilmiah nasional dan internasional, yang dianalisis melalui teknik analisis isi (content analysis) yang dipadukan dengan pendekatan SWOT dan PESTEL. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa dominasi pemilih muda mengubah paradigma komunikasi politik dari pendekatan berpusat pada figur menuju komunikasi yang menekankan kredibilitas, interaksi, transparansi, dan bukti empiris, sementara perkembangan kecerdasan buatan, media sosial, disinformasi, dan fenomena creator politics menjadi tantangan sekaligus peluang. Penelitian ini menawarkan Data-Driven Political Communication Model (DDPCM) yang mengintegrasikan analisis data pemilih, segmentasi audiens, narasi berbasis isu, pemanfaatan kecerdasan buatan, penguatan komunitas digital, dan evaluasi berkelanjutan sebagai kerangka strategis menghadapi Pemilu 2029. Penelitian menyimpulkan bahwa keberhasilan elektoral partai politik ke depan tidak hanya ditentukan oleh kekuatan organisasi, tetapi juga oleh kemampuan mengelola komunikasi politik yang adaptif, berbasis data, dan berorientasi pada kepercayaan publik.

References

Aagaard, P., & Marthedal, S. (2023). Political microtargeting: Towards a pragmatic approach. Internet Policy Review, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.14763/2023.1.1690

Battista, D. (2024). Political communication in the age of artificial intelligence: An overview of deepfakes and their implications. Society Register, 8(2), 7–24. https://doi.org/10.14746/sr.2024.8.2.01

Boulianne, S., Oser, J., & Hoffmann, C. P. (2023). Powerless in the digital age? A systematic review and meta-analysis of political efficacy and digital media use. New Media & Society, 25(9), 2512–2536. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448231176519

Calabrese, S., & Müller, J. (2025). The election year 2024 and tech policy around the world: What lessons for the European Union? International IDEA and European Partnership for Democracy. https://doi.org/10.31752/idea.2025.68

Dewi, E. A. S., Arifin, H. S., & Fuady, I. (2023). Nurturing political engagement: Political communication strategies for Generation Z in the lead-up to the 2024 election in West Java. The Journal of Society and Media, 7(2), 370–388. https://doi.org/10.26740/jsm.v7n2.p370-388

Dewi, N. R. (2025). The influence of political communication on TikTok on Gen Z’s support in the 2024 election. JPW (Jurnal Politik Walisongo), 7(1), 25–40. https://doi.org/10.21580/jpw.v7i1.23871

Gibson, R. (2023). Data-driven campaigning as a disruptive force. Political Communication, 40(3), 351–355. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2023.2207486

Hakim, L., & Hakim, I. (2025). Preferences and behaviour of Gen Z voters in the 2024 Indonesian presidential election. ARISTO, 12(3). https://doi.org/10.24269/ars.v12i3.11274

Howdle, G. (2023). Microtargeting, dogwhistles, and deliberative democracy. Topoi, 42, 445–458. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-023-09889-3

Indonesia, A. P. J. I. (2024). Survei penetrasi internet Indonesia 2024: Pengguna internet Indonesia tembus 221 juta orang. Asosiasi Penyelenggara Jasa Internet Indonesia. https://www.apjii.id/berita/d/apjii-jumlah-pengguna-internet-indonesia-tembus-221-juta-orang

Indonesia, K. P. U. R. (2025). Lembar Fakta KPU: Dominasi pemilih muda. Komisi Pemilihan Umum Republik Indonesia. https://www.kpu.go.id/dmdocument/1759822082Lembar Fakta KPU edisi 1 OKE.pdf

Juneja, P. (2024). Artificial intelligence for electoral management. International IDEA. https://doi.org/10.31752/idea.2024.31

Kemp, S. (2025). Digital 2025: Indonesia. DataReportal. https://datareportal.com/reports/digital-2025-indonesia

Kulau, F. (2024). TikTok, Instagram and presidential election: A study to understand how politainment in Indonesian political campaigns 2024. Informasi, 54(2), 164–176. https://doi.org/10.21831/informasi.v54i2.77889

Kusumawardani, V., Agustin, D. A. C., & Permatasari, S. S. (2025). Social media and political preferences among Generation Z in the 2024 Indonesian General Election. Mediakita, 9(2), 246–269. https://doi.org/10.30762/mediakita.v9i2.2762

?abuz, M., & Nehring, C. (2024). On the way to deep fake democracy? Deep fakes in election campaigns in 2023. European Political Science, 23, 454–473. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41304-024-00482-9

Marlina, D., & Hakim, L. (2025). Peran TikTok dalam kampanye politik: Strategi menarik Gen Z di Pemilu 2024. Jurnal Audiens, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.18196/jas.v6i1.587

Melchior, C., & Oliveira, M. (2024). A systematic literature review of the motivations to share fake news on social media platforms and how to fight them. New Media & Society, 26(2), 1127–1150. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448231174224

Odzuck, E., & Günther, S. (2022). Digital campaigning as a policy of democracy promotion: Applying deliberative theories of democracy to political parties. Zeitschrift Für Politikwissenschaft, 32, 507–530. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41358-021-00308-w

Pawelec, M. (2022). Deepfakes and democracy (theory): How synthetic audio-visual media for disinformation and hate speech threaten core democratic functions. Digital Society, 1(2), 19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44206-022-00010-6

Perach, R., Joyner, L., Husbands, D., & Buchanan, T. (2023). Why do people share political information and misinformation online? Developing a bottom-up descriptive framework. Social Media + Society, 9(3), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051231192032

Quick, M., & Maddox, J. (2024). Us, them, right, wrong: How TikTok’s Green Screen, Duet, and Stitch help shape political discourse. First Monday, 29(3). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v29i3.13360

Ridout, T. N., & Cakmak, F. (2024). The impact of new transparency in digital advertising on media coverage. Political Communication, 41(2), 335–343. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2024.2303159

Ronald Alfred, J. J., & Wong, S. P. (2022). The relationship between the perception of social media credibility and political engagement in social media among Generation Z. Journal of Communication, Language and Culture, 2(2), 17–32. https://doi.org/10.33093/jclc.2022.2.2.2

Stromer-Galley, J., & Rossini, P. (2024). Categorizing political campaign messages on social media using supervised machine learning. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 21(4), 410–423. https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2023.2231436

Suryawijaya, T., Fauzy, M. R. N., & Maulidina, N. F. (2024). Peran media sosial dalam membentuk partisipasi politik Gen Z pada Pemilu 2024. Jurnal Politica Dinamika Masalah Politik Dalam Negeri Dan Hubungan Internasional, 15(2). https://doi.org/10.22212/jp.v15i2.4441

Susilo, M. E., Pawito, Purwasito, A., & Rahmanto, A. N. (2024). TikTok’s influence on Indonesia’s 2024 election: From general to ‘gemoy.’ Asian Politics & Policy, 16(4), 595–599. https://doi.org/10.1111/aspp.12764

Votta, F., Dobber, T., Guinaudeau, B., Helberger, N., & de Vreese, C. (2025). The cost of reach: Testing the role of ad delivery algorithms in online political campaigns. Political Communication, 42(3), 476–508. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2024.2439317

Downloads

Published

2026-09-30

Issue

Section

Articles